| Notice to all Wild River Audubon Society members: Jess Gwinn
is a candidate for the National Audubon Society Board of Directors as
the Great Lakes Region representative.
Statement of Candidacy, Jess Gwinn
My name is Jess A. Gwinn and I am running for the office of the Great
Lakes Regional Representative to the National Audubon Society Board of
Directors. I am 43 years old and have been interested in birds since I
was a child watching the Cardinals, Robins, Blue Jays, Starlings and
other so-called city birds from my yard in Indianapolis, Indiana. It
wasn't until I moved to New Hampshire after college (BS Agricultural
Engineering and BS Land Surveying from Purdue University) that I became
more serious about birding. I joined the Seacoast Chapter of the Audubon
Society of New Hampshire and started attending outings and programs. I
moved back to Indiana in 1991 and promptly joined the Sassafras Audubon
Society, a chapter of the NAS based in Bloomington. In 1995 I was asked
to join the Sassafras board to replace a member who was leaving in mid
term. I eventually became president of the chapter from 1999 to 2001.
After leaving the board for a year I returned so that I could focus on
what has really attracted my attention all along, even from childhood,
conservation issues. I remember being horrified as a child with aerial
photographs of clear cuts. As I aged, more and more issues became known.
Being a member of an Audubon chapter has educated me about these many
issues and allowed me to speak to a larger audience about them.
The Audubon name means different things to different people. To some
it is just a general association with birds and birding. To others it
may only connote the magazine. Others still may associate the name with
NAS. My contention is that there is another subset of the population to
whom the Audubon name connotes the local chapter in their community.
These chapters are the face of Audubon to many people. To many, NAS,
like many large national organizations is somewhat of an abstract entity
based somewhere on a coast and doing who knows what. Maybe getting a
little press now and then with a stance on protecting the Arctic Refuge
or some other national issue. But the chapters are the entities we
really know on a personal level. The chapters lead outings, give
programs, clean up shore lines, take stands on local issues, compile
Christmas Bird Counts and other species inventories and in general fight
for the environment in your back yard. We are Audubon on the ground.
I applaud NAS for looking forward and setting goals for new centers
and state offices and preparing a new vision for the organization.
Unfortunately I believe that they have failed to look backwards as well
and to see one of the engines that has driven them to their present
position. In a word, chapters. We have not captured the national
spotlight on national issues like NAS. They do an admirable job of that
and I am extremely grateful for those efforts. Until recently, at least
from the perspective of our chapter, NAS has not been a very hands on
outfit. Indiana, like most of the Great Lakes states, does not have a
State Office, the supposed holy grail of Audubon support for chapters.
Nor do we have a regional office which was folded into the Ohio state
office during the NAS reorganization. There is nothing overtly negative
about any of this. Except that Indiana like the other states without
offices began to feel neglected. Forced to fend for ourselves we have
become more self sufficient as a chapter.
Then comes the proverbial straw that breaks the camels back, the
reduction with ultimate expiration of the dues split. We all pay
membership dues to NAS, regardless of affiliation with a center, office
or chapter. On the chapter level, the dues split was never enough to
cover expenses so fund raising was an annual endeavor. There was nothing
wrong with that as chapters learned innovation and also engaged their
memberships. While we never heard much from NAS, we still received the
dues split to help us get along. With the dues share being removed, what
was the connection to NAS except in name.
In the opinion of our chapters, many of the problems that NAS has
faced and was trying to address with their new vision were created by
NAS. We feel that NAS has tried to alleviate their own organizational
malaise on the backs of the chapters. Chapters for the most part live
and die on their own efforts. The only thing we asked for was a portion
of the dues to offset some of the costs. We did the rest.
So here we are. I have two goals for a term on the NAS board of
directors. First and foremost is to hammer home the importance of
chapters to the health of NAS. I think too many board members are
disconnected and unfamiliar with local chapter functions and services
provided to members. The amount of work that chapters perform in the
Audubon name is tremendous. For this work to continue, support from NAS
is imperative.
My second goal for NAS is to strengthen the NAS focus on
conservation. NAS works very effectively behind the scenes on many
issues but the membership and especially the general public need to know
about these efforts. Success in this endeavor will greatly advance the
Audubon mission as well as cultivate the increased public support that
NAS has lacked for many years.
Thank you for your vote.
Jess A. Gwinn
Solsberry, IN 47459
jagmo@bluemarble.net |